Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Dillon Lyle Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
JONES v. KASPER
as 4:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LYLE JONES
Respondent:
JEANIE KASPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Kasper
as 1:2022cv01929
Petitioner:
Christopher Lyle Jones
Respondent:
Jeanie Kasper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Jones (USA)
as 19-3105
Defendant:
Lance Jones, Anthony Marshall, AKA Ant, Aaron Harris, AKA Dog, AKA Toast, AKA Hit Man Sosa, AKA Toast and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lonnie Jones, AKA LT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
United States of America v. Jones (Lonnie Jones)
as 19-160
Defendant:
Lance Jones, Anthony Marshall, AKA Ant, Aaron Harris, AKA Dog, AKA DMX, AKA Hit Man Sosa and others
Undetermined:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lonnie Jones, AKA LT
Aguilar et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2013cv04708
Plaintiff:
Oscar Aguilar and Cuong Nguyen
Defendant:
Lyle Jones and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Jones (Richardson)
as 12-1220
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luke Jones, AKA Mega, Lance Jones, Lonnie Jones, AKA LT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Richardson
United States of America v. Jone
as 11-2936
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lance Jones, Lonnie Jones, AKA LT, Aaron Harris, AKA Dog, AKA Toast, AKA DMX, AKA Hit Man Sosa and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Luke Jones, AKA Mega
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
