Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lyman v. University of Utah
as 2:2023cv00887
Plaintiff:
Orion Lyman
Defendant:
University of Utah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Knox et al v. Me 2 You Academy of Phlebotomy LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Myonia Knox, Jasmine Lyman and J'Mil Jackson
Defendant:
Me 2 You Academy of Phlebotomy LLC and Examinetics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lyman v. Door Automation Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv06677
Plaintiff:
Erica Lyman
Defendant:
Door Automation Corp. and CEO Joshua Gatoff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lyman v. Door Automation Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv06677
Plaintiff:
Erica Lyman
Defendant:
Door Automation Corp. and Joshua Gatoff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lyman v. Gas Gathering Specialists, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
William Lyman
Defendant:
Gas Gathering Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lyman v. Gas Gathering Specialists, Inc.
as 0:2021cv02386
Plaintiff:
William Lyman
Defendant:
Gas Gathering Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Porter v. Jim N Nicks Alabaster LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01706
Defendant:
Jim N Nicks Birmingham LLC, Jim N Nicks Atlanta I LLC, Jim N Nicks Montgomery East LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Porter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nemecek et al v. Veterans Distribution of Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01337
Defendant:
Veterans Distribution of Chicago, Inc, Veterans Distribution of Chicago, Inc. and William Factor
Plaintiff:
Nemecek, Dariusz Tambor, Guadalupe Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Parrish et al v. ICI Custom Parts, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv01915
Plaintiff:
Raymond Parrish , Julios Rios, Jr. , Steve Hibbens and others
Defendant:
ICI Custom Parts, Inc., Russell O. McKee and JoAnne Kay McKee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
