Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lyncoln Danglar v. State of Georgia, et al
as 19-15042
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY C. DOZIER, sued in his offical and individual capacity, as Commissioner of the State of Georgia Department of Corrections, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SMITH SP WARDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNCOLN DANGLAR
Lyncoln Danglar v. Hassel, et al
as 19-14948
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JAY E. TOWN, SCOTT HASSEL and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
LYNCOLN DANGLAR
Danglar v. Horton et al
as 1:2019cv05512
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, Attorney General William Barr, J Suntanto and others
Not Classified By Court:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyncoln Danglar v. DHS, et al
as 19-13009
Defendant / Appellee:
DHS, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DAVID RIVERA, Field Operations Director, New Orleans for ICE DRO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNCOLN DANGLAR
Danglar v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03537
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
Commissioner Gregory C. Dozier, Ronnie Bynum, Warden Terrence Kilpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyncoln Danglar v. U.S. Attorney General
as 19-12188
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
LYNCOLN DANGLAR
DANGLAR et al v. DHS/ICE et al
as 4:2019cv00789
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO CARPIO, Lyncoln Danglar, KARIM GOLDING and others
Defendant:
Jonathon Horton and DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANGLAR et al v. DHS/ICE et al
as 1:2019cv01497
Plaintiff:
LYNCOLN DANGLAR, KARIM GOLDING, JERMAINE NEUFVILLE and others
Defendant:
DHS/ICE and JONATHON HORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danglar v. Horton et al
as 4:2019cv00494
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
Johnathon Horton and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danglar v. DHS et al
as 1:2018cv05637
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
DHS, Scott Pitman, W. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
