Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Sonnier v. Ruzicka et al
as 3:2018cv00232
Defendant:
Parole Commissioner Ira Evans and Parole Commisioner Lynn Ruzicka
Plaintiff:
Julius Sonnier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thunderhorse v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv00541
Defendant:
Beth Benoit, Joel Butler, Christopher Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Evans et al
as 4:2016cv00941
Plaintiff:
Julian Garcia
Defendant:
Ira Evans, Angleton Texas Parole Board and Lynn Ruzicka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Evans et al
as 3:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Julian Garcia
Defendant:
Ira Evans, Angleton Texas Parole Board and Lynn Ruzicka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFerrin v. Tauss et al
as 3:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lee McFerrin
Defendant:
Cynthia Tauss, Fred Rangel, Lynn Ruzicka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFerrin v. Tauss et al
as 1:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lee McFerrin
Defendant:
Cynthia Tauss, Fred Rangel, Lynn Ruzicka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Stephens et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Refugio Padilla
Defendant:
William Stephens and Lynn Ruzicka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Edwards v. Rissie Owens, et al
as 15-10024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC MAXWELL EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSIE OWENS, in her Individual and Official capacity as Director and Presiding Chair of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, JUANITA GONZALEZ, DAVID GUTIERREZ and others
Edwards v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eric Maxwell Edwards
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, Roman Chavez, Juanita Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dalco v. Angelton Parole District Office et al
as 3:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
Shronda Renee Dalco
Defendant:
Angelton Parole District Office, Lynn Ruzicka, Conrith Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
