Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 149
AIKINS v. M&T BANK et al
as 1:2022cv02610
Plaintiff: BRUCE AIKINS
Defendant: M&T BANK, ETC EQUITIES and PNC BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
H. Gurvey, et alIn re: H. Gurvey, et al
as 22-1713
Petitioner: In re: H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY
Respondent: HONORABLE GLENN GRANT, HONORABLE STUART RABNER, HONORABLE THOMAS MOORE, Esq. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00620
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Michael Siano v. M&T Bank, et al
as 22-1205
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL PATRICK SIANO
Defendant / Appellee: M&T BANK and PARKER MCCAY
AIKINS v. M&T BANK et al
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff: BRUCE AIKINS
Defendant: M&T BANK and PNC BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01849
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
H. Gurvey, et al v. Glenn Grant, et al
as 21-2953
Plaintiff / Appellant: H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY
Defendant: HONORABLE GLENN GRANT, HONORABLE STUART RABNER, HONORABLE THOMAS MOORE, Esq. and others
H. Gurvey, et al v. M&T Bank Inc, et al
as 21-2936
Plaintiff / Appellant: H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY
Defendant / Appellee: M&T BANK INC, a NY Banking Corporation and SCHILLER KNAPP LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL LLP
Appellee: AARON M. BENDER and REED SMITH LLP
GURVEY et al v. GRANT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv16397
Plaintiff: H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY
Defendant: HON. GLENN A. GRANT, HON. STUART RABNER, HON. THOMAS MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03267
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?