Cases 11 - 20 of 279
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2023cv10040
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marie Hatfield and Danny M Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lynnette M. Shenko v. Christina M. Coulter et al
as 2:2022cv09232
Plaintiff:
Lynnette M. Shenko
Defendant:
Christina M. Coulter, Lisa M. Sullivan, Nicole H. Head and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Warbington v. Irwin et al
as 1:2022cv04926
Plaintiff:
Richard Ronald Warbington
Defendant:
David B. Irwin and Debra M. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burnett et al
as 1:2022cv10056
Plaintiff:
Ralph Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edward R. Burnett, John Doe #1, Stephen Urbanski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy OGuinn v. Lisa Walsh, et al
as 22-16521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY A. OGUINN
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA WALSH, Added on docket per ECF No. 17 Screening Order, MARTIN JAMES NAUGHTON, #12 SAC, M. SULLIVAN and others
Smith v. Forsythe Finance LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Marcie Smith
Defendant:
Forsythe Finance LLC, Law Offices of Timothy M Sullivan, Jeffrey L Koberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morgan v. Hanger, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07733
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Hanger, Inc., Vinit K. Asar, Christopher B. Begley and others
Jenkins v. Hanger, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07644
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Hanger, Inc., Christopher B. Begley, Vinit K. Asar and others
Johnson v. Hanger, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01183
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Hanger, Inc., Christopher B. Begley, Vinit K. Asar and others
Cataldi v. Hanger Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07461
Plaintiff:
Russel Cataldi
Defendant:
Hanger Inc., Christopher B. Begley, Vinit K. Ansar and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
