Cases 1 - 10 of 31
TAYLOR v. HALLER
as 2:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
ALEXANDER TOY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
TAYLOR v. HONORABLE DAVID ACKER et al
as 2:2023cv01489
Petitioner:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Respondent:
HONORABLE DAVID ACKER and ALEXANDER ROY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DETSCHELT v. NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DETSCHELT
Defendant:
NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT and JEFFREY M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH et al
as 2:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
LAWERANCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH, HEATHER STARR and LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. WARDEN OF FBOP, et al.
as 2:2022cv03866
Petitioner:
VERSIAH M. TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FBOP, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JACKSON v. TALNODGE et al
as 2:2019cv02880
Defendant:
CATHY M. TALNODGE, CO. R. CREAMER, LOVE and others
Plaintiff:
MR. DWAYNE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. CHESMER et al
as 2:2018cv01579
Defendant:
SUPER. ROBERT GILMORE, SGT. CHESMER, LT. TROUT and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
United States Of America v. Taylor et al
as 3:2017cv01327
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Dennis A. Taylor and Pamela M. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
TAYLOR v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv01059
Plaintiff:
KIM M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
