Cases 1 - 10 of 78
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03651
Plaintiff:
ROCHELE MAIA SANTINO and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and John M. Allen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Donk et al v. Grisham et al
as 1:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Randy Donk, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and Gun Owners Foundation
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, Patrick M. Allen, Jason R. Bowie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharfuddin v. Jaddou et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Babar Sharfuddin
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, John M. Allen, Ur M Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anuch Sen Ouk et al v. Antony Blinken et al
as 2:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
ANUCH SEN OUK and CHANTHA SEANG
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO J. MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Daniel et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Fifi Esperanca Daniel
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, John M. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Munoz Farieta v. USCIS et al
as 1:2022cv24114
Plaintiff:
William Julian Munoz Farieta
Defendant:
USCIS, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Munoz Farieta v. USCIS et al
as 1:2022cv24107
Plaintiff:
William Julian Munoz Farieta
Defendant:
USCIS, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chen v. Jaddou et al
as 3:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Likun Chen
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, John M Allen and Ur M Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Largo Concrete Inc. et al v. Allen et al
as 5:2022cv07689
Plaintiff:
Largo Concrete Inc. and Pavan Ram Guptha
Defendant:
John M. Allen, UR MENDOSA JADDOU, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
