Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Pierre v. Garland, et al.
as 24-1323
Petitioner:
ANTONIO EDIOR PIERRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and M. BOWEN, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02606
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bowen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03495
Plaintiff:
Deborah M. Bowen
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bowen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03096
Plaintiff:
Elaine M Bowen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jagger Bowen v. Jeri Taylor
as 20-36081
Respondent / Appellee:
JERI TAYLOR
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAGGER M. BOWEN
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06319
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES, For the Use of BOWEN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL, a California General Partnership et al v. Hal Hays Construction, Inc., a California corporation et al
as 1:2020at00660
Plaintiff:
Bowen Engineering and Environmental, Daniel E Bowen, Erik Bowen and others
Defendant:
Hal Hays Construction, Inc., a California corporation and Western Surety Company, a South Dakota corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States et al v. Hal Hays Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01256
Plaintiff:
United States, Erik Bowen, Bowen Engineering and Environmental and others
Defendant:
Western Surety Company and Hal Hays Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowen v. Ladoucer
as 4:2019cv40117
Respondent:
Kristie J. Ladoucer
Petitioner:
James M Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
