Cases 1 - 10 of 28
HILL v. HARRY et al
as 2:2020cv01841
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY
Petitioner:
DWIGHT M. HILL
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILL et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20286
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP, MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
HOWARD R. HILL and ANNE M. HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. BARNACLE et al
as 2:2013cv01604
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCELROY et al v. BROWN et al
as 5:2013cv06216
Plaintiff:
MARK E. MCELROY , GARY E. MCELROY, SR. , JEANIE D. KEEFER and others
Defendant:
THOMAS V. BROWN and BRIAN M. HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv01697
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. BARNACLE et al
as 2:2012cv01145
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv52263
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M HILL
Defendant:
ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48499
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND M. HILL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HILL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv52264
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M HILL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HILL et al v. ABEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64580
Plaintiff:
ALBERT M HILL and NANCY HILL
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
