Cases 21 - 30 of 587
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02291
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Jeremiah Hoskins, DeMarcus Bush and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson
as 4:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Parnell R May
Defendant:
M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. Robert Jackson
as 23-35243
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Cantrell v. Scofild et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant:
Scofild, M Jackson, D Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Robert Jackson
as 23-35181
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT M. JACKSON
Tavron v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
M Jackson, III, C Johnson, J Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
