Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Wakefield et al
as 1:2021cv00825
Respondent:
Chad Wakefield, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and M. L. Ebert, Jr.
Petitioner:
Scott Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00678
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 676 AND EMPLOYERS ANNUITY FUND et al v. M L RUBERTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2015cv05767
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 676 AND EMPLOYERS ANNUITY FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 676 AND EMPLOYERS VACATION FUND
Defendant:
M L RUBERTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. CEBALLO et al
as 5:2013cv02486
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
LUCIANO CEBALLO and JULIUS M L M, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Tangert v. Crossan et al
as 1:2011cv02395
Plaintiff:
Barry R. Tangert, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Crossan, Scott Miller, William Fraley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELDON v. NEAL et al
as 2:2011cv01128
Plaintiff:
STEVE R. SHELDON
Defendant:
SCOTT NEAL, TIMOTHY WILES, BYRON LOCKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. H. K. PORTER, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79658
Plaintiff:
M. L. MURRAY
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER, INC., GAF CORPORATION, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAVLEY v. BEARD et al
as 2:2009cv01326
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GRAVLEY, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERY BEARD, DORINA VARNER, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALDWELL v. FOGEL, et al
as 2:2008cv00728
Plaintiff:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant:
ALAN B. FOGEL, CINDY S. WATSON, JEFF MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
