Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pollard, Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Wesley M Pollard, Sr.
Respondent:
Lonnie Oliver, Samuel M. Sanguedolce and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pollard v. County of Luzerne
as 1:2021cv00028
Respondent:
County of Luzerne and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Wesley M. Pollard, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pollard v. USA
as 1:2020cv00741
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dehaven M. Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pollard, Sr. v. County of Luzerne et al
as 1:2020cv00611
Respondent:
County of Luzerne and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Wesley M. Pollard, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POLLARD v. MCNAMARA
as 2:2019cv00907
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN M. POLLARD
Defendant:
GARRET MCNAMARA and GARRET M. MCNAMARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pollard v. County of Luzerne et al
as 3:2018cv02248
Defendant:
County of Luzerne, Jenny Roberts, Stefanie Joy Salavants and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley M. Pollard, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pollard v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2018cv01381
Defendant:
Speck, Lt., C.O. Anderson, C.O. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley M Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLLARD v. FERGUSON et al
as 3:2017cv01165
Petitioner:
WESLEY M. POLLARD, SR.
Respondent:
Tammy Ferguson, The District Attorney of the County of Luzerne, . and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POLLARD v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2017cv01951
Petitioner:
WESLEY M. POLLARD, SR.
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LUZERNE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pollard v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2017cv00344
Plaintiff:
Wesley M. Pollard, Sr.
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson and John E. Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
