Cases 31 - 40 of 41
United States of America v. Nolasco
as 12-3929
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Erick Nolasco, AKA Eluit Maysonet, AKA Eluit M. Rivera
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00914
Plaintiff:
Angel M. Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kindell v. N.Y.S. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2012cv04579
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kindell
Defendant:
Correctional Officer #8208, The City of New York, E. Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Teen Mania Ministries, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv02936
Plaintiff:
Ana M. Rivera
Defendant:
Teen Mania Ministries, Inc. and New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purisima v. Bryan et al
as 1:2011cv09159
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
We Care (F.E.G.S.), F.E.G.S. We Care IFH Clinic, Davida Joy Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Social Security Admin
as 3:2010cv00985
Plaintiff:
Gloria M. Rivera
Defendant:
Social Security Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 1:2009cv03156
Plaintiff:
Juanita M. Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McGown v. Mayors Office of Special Enforcement et al
as 1:2009cv04991
Plaintiff:
James McGown
Defendant:
Mayors Office of Special Enforcement, Mike Bloomberg, Edward Sklar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2009cv06108
Plaintiff:
Maria M. Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rivera v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv06742
Plaintiff:
Connie M. Rivera, Connie M. Rivera and Connie M. Rivera
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
