Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Rivera v. Hackett et al
as 3:2018cv00969
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Rivera
Defendant:
Hackett, Burgos, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Bolt et al
as 9:2018cv00416
Defendant:
M. Rivera, K. Hayes and J. Bolt
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Roy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Flood v. Just Energy Marketing Corp.
as 17-546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin Flood, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Abigail Wiltz, Yalontya Simmons and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Just Energy Marketing Corp., Just Energy New York Corp. and Just Energy Group Inc.
In re: State of New York
as 17-310
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
State of New York and William J. Rold
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Southern District, (New York City)
Defendant:
Raff & Becker, L.L.P., David Alan Raff, Robert L. Becker and others
Purisima v. City of New York ("City") et al
as 1:2016cv09786
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
City of New York ("City"), Human Resources Administration (HRA), T. Edema and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Sticht
as 6:2016cv06626
Petitioner:
Joseph M. Rivera
Respondent:
Thomas J. Sticht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Finch v. Rivera et al
as 3:2015cv01715
Plaintiff:
Charity Finch
Defendant:
Angel M. Rivera and Nadege Rosembert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bey v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv04918
Plaintiff:
Baxter Aziz Bey
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Edward Gannon, Julie Colin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Diana M. Rivera
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
MacNeill et al v. OptumInsight, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04730
Plaintiff:
John MacNeill and Keila M. Rivera
Defendant:
OptumInsight, Inc. and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
