Cases 1 - 10 of 278
Smith v. D.O.N. et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
John M. Smith
Defendant:
D.O.N., Bean and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
1718 Las Palmas, LLC v. Bianca M. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
1718 Las Palmas, LLC doing business as Archer Apartments
Defendant:
Bianca M. Smith, Alvaro Bravo and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, et al. v. Myers, et al.
as 24-349
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROSE JOHNSON, individually, and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan M. Smith, and behalf of all beneficiaries, MARK SMITH, KAHLLENA A. SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MYERS and RYAN BEECROFT
Defendant:
CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, DANIEL JOHNSON and DOES, 1-50
Nicois M. Smith v. Warden D. Silva
as 2:2023cv09429
Petitioner:
Nicois M. Smith
Respondent:
Warden D. Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Seabert et al
as 2:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Donald Keith Chapman
Defendant:
D Seabert, J Hickman, D Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur G. Smith et al v. MAS Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Arthur G Smith and Kerri M Smith
Defendant:
MAS Financial Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
