Cases 21 - 30 of 38
HANNAH v. ADMINISTRATOR ALBERT C. WAGNER YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv08066
Plaintiff:
KARON HANNAH
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR ALBERT C. WAGNER YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MARK GOODMAN, M. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2017cv03852
Petitioner:
RICHARD M. SMITH
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HOUTZDALE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05849
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOZER v. RIGGENBACH et al
as 2:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Defendant:
ANGELA RIGGENBACH, L.S. KERNS-BARR, MARK DIALESANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Bey v. Altmanshofer
as 3:2014cv02029
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Smith-Bey
Defendant:
William Altmanshofer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TARSELLI v. HARKLAND et al
as 2:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
TODD (HYUNG-RAE) TARSELLI
Defendant:
HARKLAND , J. M. SMITH , HAYWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv01208
Petitioner:
Kenneth M. Smith
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv02394
Plaintiff:
Shawn Jordan
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, F.J. Tennis, R. Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
