Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 128
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION et al v. BIPV, INC.
as 2:2016cv00057
Plaintiff: CERTAINTEED CORPORATION , SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION , HUSNU M. KALKANOGLU and others
Defendant: BIPV, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SMITH v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv06376
Plaintiff: CHARELL M. SMITH
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith-Bey v. Altmanshofer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv02029
Plaintiff: Carl M. Smith-Bey
Defendant: William Altmanshofer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETROSKI et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv05447
Plaintiff: JUNE PETROSKI and THOMAS PETROSKI
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , SADIE M. SMITH, MICHELLE ROCHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03606
Plaintiff: MARY M. SMITH
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00680
Plaintiff: BRIAN J. SMITH, JR. , SEAN P. SMITH , JOANNE M. SMITH and others
Defendant: AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC., AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC. WELFARE PLAN, UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TARSELLI v. HARKLAND et al
as 2:2013cv01824
Plaintiff: TODD (HYUNG-RAE) TARSELLI
Defendant: HARKLAND , J. M. SMITH , HAYWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01801
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SMITH v. ALORICA INC./PRC
as 2:2013cv01649
Plaintiff: SHANNON M. SMITH
Defendant: ALORICA INC./PRC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. THE BECKER MANAGEMENT GROUP et al
as 2:2013cv04093
Plaintiff: PATRICIA M. SMITH
Defendant: THE BECKER MANAGEMENT GROUP , JUDITH BECKER RUBIN and WILMA SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?