Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Smith, Deandre v. Eplett, Cheryl
as 3:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Deandre M. Smith
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith, Virgil v. Barrett et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Virgil M. Smith
Defendant:
Barrett and Woltgen
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speights, Jael v. Agnesian Healthcare et al
as 3:2020cv01098
Defendant:
Eileen S. Gavin, Agnesian Healthcare, "John Doe" Employer of Eileen S. Gavin and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Jael Speights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kind et al
as 2:2020cv01588
Defendant:
HSU Department, John Kind, Warden Dylan Radtke and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio M Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yang et al v. Powers et al
as 1:2020cv00760
Defendant:
Kurt Eggebrecht, Commissioner Marge Bostelmann, Mark L Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Martin Driftmeier, Sr., Jenny Leigh Turkelson, Sandra Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Rajendra et al
as 2:2019cv01199
Defendant:
Mark D Smith, Gloster B Current, Kevin Wheeler and others
Nominal Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ian Pierce
Sawyer v. Bastianelli et al
as 2:2018cv01843
Defendant:
Cathy A Jess, Judy Smith, Toni Young and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Racine Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Derrick E Brooks
Defendant:
Racine Correctional Institution, Paul Kemper , Michelle Bones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00873
Plaintiff:
Vergie M Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00849
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
