Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Williams v. Tik-Tok, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Tik-Tok, Inc., Zhang Yiming and TIK TOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and SGT TELUR ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Ravis M. Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. AT&T
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry A. Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Christina M. Williams
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCluskey EL v. Hodges Bethge et al
as 1:2023cv24496
Plaintiff:
Tara McCluskey EL and Tara McCluskey a Noble
Defendant:
Laura Hodges Bethge, Lisa Lutoff- Perlo, Celebrity Cruises, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
