Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. WILLIAMS, MOSES R. JENKINS and Moses R. Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lohr, Jr et al v. The Chemours Company FC, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Plaintiff:
Sooner Ventures LLC, Timothy Hill, Tonja Vaughn and others
Defendant:
E.I. duPont Chemical Corporation, Michael E Johnson, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Stein
as 5:2018hc02108
Petitioner:
Michael M. Williams
Respondent:
Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dennis M. Williams
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lisane, Jr. et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lisane, Jr. , Jacqueline McCalop Lisane , Carolyn Ann Glasper and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Gwenerva M. Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 5:2013ct03033
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Williams
Defendant:
Felix C. Taylor, FNU Blowe and North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewett v. Sue et al
as 7:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
Bernest Hewett
Defendant:
M. William Sue, Phil Norris, John Martin Cooke, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lucas v. Brake, et al
as 5:2012cv00735
Plaintiff:
Harold E Lucas
Defendant:
Sean Brake, Charlie Barker, Norlina Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
