Cases 1 - 8 of 8
D.A.M., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A.R.G.., a minor, J.S.M., L.O.R. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and William Pelham Barr, Attorney General of the United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
M.M.V., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E.M.R., L.O.R., J.C.P., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Davidson, Acting USCIS Asylum Division Chief, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, James McHenry, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
M.M.V., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5106
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Davidson, Acting USCIS Asylum Division Chief, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Mark A. Morgan, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L.O.R., J.C.P., a minor, E.A.N., a minor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
M.M.B et al v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01130
Plaintiff:
M.M.B and Margaret Marealle
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Colebut v. Levin et al
as 3:2011cv01274
Plaintiff:
Noerck Colebut
Defendant:
Barry Levin, M.M.B Management Co. L.L.C., Gilman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
