Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mukes v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2018cv02555
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Trent Hall, Leon Jose and others
Plaintiff:
Marquette D. Mukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crestmark Bank v. CIBC Bank USA f/k/a The PrivateBank and Trust Company et al
as 2:2018cv11616
Defendant:
Branko Shapich, Joseph Hasnos, Howard Lehigh Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Crestmark Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clemons v. State of Tennessee, et al.
as 2:2017cv02349
Plaintiff:
Frederick Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, Town of Collierville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson Climate Technologies, Inc. v. M.P.D., Inc.
as 3:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Emerson Climate Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
M.P.D., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. American Airlines Arena et al
as 1:2013cv20586
Plaintiff:
Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
American Airlines Arena, Mickey Airison, M.P.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Marks v. B/R/
as 1:2012cv00883
Plaintiff:
Julius Marks
Defendant:
B/R/M.P.D./M.C.D.F./A.E.C./A.S.B./A.D.O.C.A.F.C.H./C.R.A./A.D.A.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. State of TN et al
as 2:2011cv02903
Plaintiff:
Donald Holmes
Defendant:
State of TN, M.P.D. and Shelby County Gov.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. M.P.D. et al
as 2:2011cv02266
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
M.P.D., U.S.Government, Steve Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Widespread Harrassment et al
as 2:2010cv02889
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Widespread Harrassment, Wartime Retro Laser Satellite, U.S. Metro Broadcasting Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Redick et al
as 2:2010cv02432
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Kelly
Defendant:
B. Redick, M.P.D. Officer 2833 and Memphis Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
