Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,176
Jenkins v. Campbell, et al.
as 24-2736
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEE JENKINS
Defendant: T.L. CAMPBELL, Warden, L. HURTADO, Correctional Officer and Z. MADDEN, Correctional Officer
Kevin Dwayne Walker v. Superior Court of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03326
Petitioner: Kevin Dwayne Walker
Respondent: Superior Court of Los Angeles and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Steven Madden Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv03131
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant: Steven Madden Ltd, a Delaware Corporation and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Shaffer v. Madden
as 24-2343
Petitioner: SHAWN EDWARD SHAFFER
Respondent: RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
LINFO IP, LLC, v. STEVE MADDEN, LTD.,
as 7:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: LINFO IP, LLC,
Defendant: STEVE MADDEN, LTD.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Madden v. Deputy Andrade et al
as 8:2024cv00510
Plaintiff: Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant: Deputy Andrade, John Doe and John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 173.171.39.165
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Madden v. Revive Organics, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00670
Plaintiff: Jamie Madden
Defendant: Revive Organics, Inc. doing business as Revive Superfoods and Miski Organics Superfoods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Madden
as 24-2140
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CARL MARK MADDEN
Tarabein v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: Rassan M. Tarabein
Defendant: Kathryn Scott, Driftwood Investigations, LLC, John W. Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?