Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Trondo Humphrey v. City of Anderson, et al
as 21-2818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRONDO HUMPHREY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ANDERSON, TERRY SOLLARS, RODNEY J. CUMMINGS and others
GEFT OUTDOOR, L.L.C. v. CITY OF ANDERSON, MADISON COUNTY, INDIANA
as 1:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
GEFT OUTDOOR, L.L.C.
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON, MADISON COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Palmer v. Madison County, Indiana
as 17-3486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
MADISON COUNTY, INDIANA
LEWIS v. CITY OF ELWOOD, INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv03316
Defendant:
PHILLIP CALDWELL, CITY OF ELWOOD, INDIANA, NATHAN HIATT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DALE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. MELLINGER et al
as 1:2016cv03057
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. LEWIS
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY INDIANA and SCOTT MELLINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billy Julian v. Sam Hanna, et al
as 13-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY JULIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM HANNA, DAVID HUFFMAN, WILLIAM AMICK and others
STOUT v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2012cv01304
Defendant:
DANIEL KOPP, WILLIAM F. LAWLER, JR., MADISON COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE STOUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JULIAN v. HANNA et al
as 1:2011cv01536
Defendant:
WILLIAM AMICK, THE TOWN OF FRANKTON, INDIANA, THE FRANKTON-LAPEL COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BILLY JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEISURE v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEISURE
Defendant:
RON RICHARDSON and SHERRIFF MADISON COUNTY INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALEXANDER v. MADISON COUNTY (INDIANA) et al
as 1:2008cv01421
Plaintiff:
HELENA J. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY (INDIANA), RODNEY J. CUMMINGS and INDIANA ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
