Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fullington v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05190
Plaintiff:
Shawn Matthew Fullington
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salanoa v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05126
Plaintiff:
Muelu Salanoa, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andres v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Bismar Francisco Andres
Defendant:
Pierce County, Severson, C/O Desmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Neil Rudolph
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05749
Plaintiff:
Jacy Joe Estes
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Widland v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05719
Plaintiff:
Brian Douglas Widland, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacy v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05718
Plaintiff:
Scott Ryan Stacy
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
