Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Malone v. Mnuchin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00755
Plaintiff: Ralph Matthews Malone
Defendant: Steve Mnuchin and United States Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ringer v. Dial et al
as 4:2016cv00504
Plaintiff: Roger Ringer
Defendant: Dustin Dial , Tucson, City of , Christopher Staring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malone v. Shartle
as 4:2016cv00413
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Malone
Respondent: JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Malone v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv02205
Petitioner: Donald Roy Malone
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. McClintock
as 4:2014cv02114
Petitioner: Dennell R Malone
Respondent: Susan McClintock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Malone v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02054
Plaintiff: Theresa Malone
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01057
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Malone v. Berry
as 2:2013cv00426
Plaintiff: Ralph Matthews Malone
Defendant: John Berry
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Malone v. McClintock
as 4:2013cv00103
Petitioner: Dennell R Malone
Respondent: Susan McClintock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00103
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?