Cases 11 - 20 of 117
GRAVES v. GAMBLE et al
as 1:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
BENNIE D. GRAVES
Defendant:
KENNETH J. GAMBLE, KELLY MALONE and JOHN LOOMIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv05237
Plaintiff:
TORIN MALONE SMITH and AMANDA GERACI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH, et al. v. DOE, et al.
as 2:2021cv05241
Plaintiff:
TORIN MALONE SMITH and AMANDA GERACI
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOODENOUGH et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
MARK GOODENOUGH, ROY HARDCASTLE, PHILIP ROACHE and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITFIELD v. NEW SENIOR INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03832
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
NEW SENIOR INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., FRANCES ALDRICH SEVILLA-SACASA, SUSAN GIVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MALONE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05147
Plaintiff:
DALE MALONE
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., "JANE DOE", "XYZ CORP" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT et al v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2020cv02012
Plaintiff:
NANCY J. WRIGHT and RICHARD A. MALONE
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MALONE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv02800
Petitioner:
RASEAN MALONE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
