Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Boucher v. Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Clayton Boucher
Defendant:
Johnson City Tennessee, Shane Malone and Paul Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Regional One Health Loop Center et al
as 2:2018cv02606
Defendant:
Trevina H. Springer, Garnett Miller, Anita Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritts et al v. Simerly et al
as 2:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Carter County, Tennessee, Jonathan Simerly, Michael Malone and others
Plaintiff:
Garry Fritts and Cynthia Fritts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Malone v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2018cv02251
Plaintiff:
Patricia Malone
Defendant:
Shelby County, Paul Hagerman, Austin Scholefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone et al v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2018cv02201
Plaintiff:
April Malone and Celitria Watson
Defendant:
Shelby County, Paul Hagerman, Austin Scholfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. TDOC et al
as 2:2018cv02155
Petitioner:
Patricia Malone
Respondent:
TDOC , SCDC and Amy Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Southeastern Carpenters & Millwrights Health Trust Fund et al v. Odom Construction Systems, LLC
as 3:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Carpenters & Millwrights Health Trust Fund , Southeastern Carpenters & Millwrights Pension Trust Fund , J. Kirk Malone and others
Defendant:
Odom Construction Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Malone v. Lee
as 2:2017cv02913
Petitioner:
Aaron Malone
Respondent:
Randy Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. West Quality Food Service et al
as 2:2017cv02760
Plaintiff:
Curtis Malone
Defendant:
West Quality Food Service
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
