Cases 11 - 20 of 233
Diaz-Cruz v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv01302
Defendant:
Ted Williams, Jeffery Rackovan, Doctor Symons and others
Plaintiff:
Kristan Diaz-Cruz
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHY v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2018cv05447
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LAMAS and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner:
MARCUS ARCHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2018cv05443
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAHMAL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. NICHOLSON et al
as 2:2018cv03328
Plaintiff:
MALEEK BROWN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LAMAS, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT JOHN NICHOLSON and RNC SHIRLEY LAW-SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHORT v. LAMAS
as 2:2018cv03550
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS
Petitioner:
HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STOKES v. BOURNE et al
as 2:2017cv03669
Plaintiff:
WILLIE STOKES
Defendant:
NEKO BOURNE, MARIROSA LAMAS, MARK WAHL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTION et al
as 2:2017cv03254
Plaintiff:
JOSE VASQUEZ MORALES
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTION, MARIROSA LAMAS and TOMLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNO v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2015cv06307
Petitioner:
JUNIUS BURNO
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TABANSI v. SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL et al
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
SEHU KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
SCI FOREST J-BLOCK RHU ET AL, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JEFFREY HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Garman et al
as 3:2015cv01446
Plaintiff:
Steven Mack
Defendant:
Mark Garman, Steven Glunt, Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
