Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Campbell v. Pfister
as 1:2020cv01062
Petitioner:
Mark B Campbell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Randy Pfister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark A. Campbell v. Kevin Kallas, et al
as 18-2075
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK A. CAMPBELL, also known as Nicole Rose Campbell
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN KALLAS, RYAN HOLTZMACHER, JAMES GREER and others
Campbell, Mark et al v. Bruce et al
as 3:2017cv00775
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Campbell and Steven Miller
Defendant:
Bruce , Robert Krueger , Jason Aldana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell, Mark v. Foster, Brian et al
as 3:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Campbell
Defendant:
Brian Foster , Kevin Kallas, Ryan Holzmacher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Lemke et al
as 1:2014cv01698
Plaintiff:
Mark B Campbell
Defendant:
Michael Lemke, Ricardo Tejeda and James Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Campbell v. Brian Foster
as 13-3780
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK A. CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN FOSTER, Warden
Mark Campbell v. AR Department of Correction, et al
as 12-3053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark E. Campbell
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Grant Harris, Former Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, John Whalen, Former Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Campbell, Mark v. Bartow, Bryan
as 3:2012cv00225
Petitioner:
Mark A. Campbell
Respondent:
Bryan Bartow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
Mark E Campbell
Defendant:
Grant Harris, John Whalen, Darryl Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Mt Ida Arkansas, City of et al
as 6:2009cv06101
Plaintiff:
Mark E Campbell
Defendant:
Mt Ida Arkansas, City of, Wendell Adams, Gary D Hogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
