Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Hartleib v. Dayton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2012cv00344
Plaintiff: Lloyd Hartleib
Defendant: Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krych v. DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2011cv03091
Plaintiff: Chris Krych
Defendant: DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants, Kent Johansen, Barbara Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00448
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02205
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Reetz v. Londre et al
as 1:2008cv00339
Plaintiff: Edmund James Reetz
Defendant: Scott Londre, Mark Hansen, Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03410
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03195
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00394
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?