Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cruz v. Reid-Anderson
as 24-10103
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dela Cruz, derivatievely on behalf of Nominal Defendant Six Flags Entertainment Corp
Defendant:
James Reid-Anderson, W. Marshall Barber, Richard W. Roedel and others
Mark Kane v. Matson Navigation Company, et al
as 23-15534
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK KANE, an inidividual
Defendant / Appellee:
MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, a Hawaii corporation and THEODORE E. BERNHARD, an individual
Dela Cruz v. Reid-Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dela Cruz
Defendant:
James Reid-Anderson, W. Marshall Barber, Richard W Roedel and others
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Kane et al
as 1:2022cv02603
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mark Kane, Dolores Borrero and Derrick Puente
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Kane v. Matson Navigation Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04583
Plaintiff:
Mark Kane
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Company, Inc. and Theodore E. Bernhard
KANE v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2018cv03178
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MARK GARMAN
Petitioner:
MARK KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeter et al v. CEP Mid-Continent L.L.C. et al
as 4:2015cv00455
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Jeter , Joe A Jeter , Barbara Lucas and others
Defendant:
CEP Mid-Continent L.L.C., Robert M Kane, Louise Kane Roarke and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Kane et al v. Safetran Systems Corporation
as 1:2010cv03596
Plaintiff:
Mark Kane and James F. Shockley
Defendant:
Safetran Systems Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Safetran Systems Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Mark Kane and James F. Shockley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KANE v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2009cv03610
Petitioner:
MARK KANE
Respondent:
FRANKLIN TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
