Cases 31 - 39 of 39
HANKINS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
JEFFARY A. BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VICTOR v. CONNOLLY et al
as 3:2007cv00292
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant:
GERARD MAJELLA CONNOLLY, MARK KRYSEVIG, FRANCISCAN FRIARS FOR IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PROVINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv01398
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. ALLEN
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN SHAFFER, FRED MAUE, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLES v. KRYSEVIG et al
as 2:2007cv04151
Petitioner:
MARC SAINT CLAIR CHARLES
Respondent:
MARK KRYSEVIG, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POLLARD v. KRYSEVIG et al
as 1:2007cv00259
Petitioner:
MARK POLLARD
Respondent:
MARK KRYSEVIG and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toner v. Krysevig
as 3:2007cv01511
Petitioner:
Robert Toner
Respondent:
Mark Krysevig and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NALLS v. KRYSEVIG et al
as 2:2007cv02744
Petitioner:
EDDIE NALLS
Respondent:
MARK KRYSEVIG, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2007cv00867
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. BEARD et al
as 2:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, JOHN SHAFFER, FRED MAUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
