Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rucker v. Esper
as 21-2540
Petitioner / Appellant: Randal Rucker
Respondent / Appellee: Mark T. Esper, Secretary of the Army Department of the Army, Mark Averill and The Honorable James Mattis
Defendant: Department of Army, Department of Defense and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv01958
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv04015
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rein v. Esper
as 19-842
Defendant / Appellee: Secretary Eric K. Fanning, United States Department of the Army, United States Department of Army, Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper, United States Department of the Army and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Donna Rein
Dedjoe v. Esper
as 19-661
Plaintiff / Appellant: Benjamin A. Dedjoe
Defendant / Appellee: Dr. Mark T. Esper, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Army
Cillie v. Esper We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00334
Defendant: Mark T. Esper
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Cillie
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Miller v. United States Department of Ar
as 19-46
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marytherese Miller
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Army and Mark T. Esper
Rucker v. Esper
as 1:2018cv04272
Plaintiff: Randal Rucker
Respondent: Mark T. Esper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv06525
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ag Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05995
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?