Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Santana Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marlin Santana Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Virginia Bruner, Amy L. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Marlin et al
as 4:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Bell
Defendant:
Connor Marlin, Dave Thomas, Rusty Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santana Thomas v. Bruner et al
as 4:2021cv00291
Plaintiff:
Marlin Santana Thomas
Defendant:
Virginia Bruner, Helen Adams, Andrew J. Graeve and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Iver Johnson Hercules Shotgun et al
as 3:2021cv03024
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Iver Johnson Hercules Shotgun, Shapleighs Unknown Shotgun, Remington Arms Company, Inc., 1100 Shotgun and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 922
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Feeney v. Davenport Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Edward Steven Feeney, Jr
Defendant:
Davenport Police Department, John Marlin Hutcheson, Jr, Bryan Christopher Butt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbst v. Bush Boake Allen Inc et al
as 5:2017cv04008
Plaintiff:
Marlin Herbst
Defendant:
Bush Boake Allen, Inc, International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc, Givaudan Flavors Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Glen Haven Home et al
as 1:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Marlin E Jones
Defendant:
Glen Haven Home, Trevor Blesh and Deborah Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osthus v. Ingredion, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00038
Defendant:
Ingredion, Inc
Plaintiff:
Marlin O Osthus
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
