Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jonassen et al v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Defendant:
I. Jacquez, D. Suh, B. Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 19-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCUM, CO, USP Tuscon, STANGL, WYNN, USP Tuscon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant:
LAUREN HOLLEY, Marshal, NEAMTU, CO, USP Tucson, GREG THIEL, Marshal and others
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 18-16621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARCUM, CO, USP Tuscon, JOHANNES, Correctional Officer, USP Tucson and others
Martin Jonassen v. J. Shartle
as 18-16364
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Martin Jonassen v. J. Shartle
as 18-15809
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 17-17420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN MARCUM, CO, USP Tucson, UNKNOWN JOHANNES, Correctional Officer, USP Tucson and others
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 17-16927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GREG THIEL, Marshal, LAUREN HOLLEY, Marshal and others
Jonassen v. Shartle
as 4:2017cv00284
Petitioner:
Martin Jonassen
Respondent:
Unknown Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 14-16377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN MARCUM, CO, USP Tucson, UNKNOWN MCCALLAN, Cor. Officer, USP Tucson and others
Jonassen v. United States of America et al
as 4:2013cv00792
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen
Defendant:
United States of America, Greg Thiel, Lauren Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
