Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jenkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2020cv01014
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Marvin Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. Wilkie
as 19-1768
Not Yet Classified:
MARVIN JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Jenkins v. BNSF Railway Company
as 19-1691
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and SMART UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jenkins v. Lopez
as 1:2014cv01857
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jenkins
Defendant:
J. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
as 1:2014cv01795
Plaintiff:
Marvin Jenkins
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Padilla (Rodriguez)
as 11-5443
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Padilla, AKA Cuson, James Albizu, AKA Pito, Roberto Colon, AKA Papo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven Camacho, AKA Spanky, AKA Spank and Jaime Rodriguez, AKA Jay
United States of America v. Padilla (Camacho)
as 11-5448
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Padilla, AKA Cuson, James Albizu, AKA Pito, Roberto Colon, AKA Papo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven Camacho, AKA Spanky, AKA Spank
JENKINS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35529
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JENKINS v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv86773
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
