Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Estate of Janice Mary Kelly, Deceased v. The People's Republic of China et al
as 3:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Estate of Janice Mary Kelly, Deceased
Defendant:
The People's Republic of China, The Communist Party of China, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Hatcher et al v. Genessee County et al
as 2:2018cv11986
Plaintiff:
Imani Hatcher , De'Angelo Lansdown , Elvin Coleman and others
Defendant:
Genessee County, Robert Pickell and Jason Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams-Kiel et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11416
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Adams-Kiel , George Kiel , Lawrence Adolph and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly, et al v. Purtha, et al
as 1:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Mary Kelly and Michael W. Keefe
Defendant:
Dalton Purtha, Amy Purtha, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00761
Plaintiff:
Mary Kelly
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCrory v. Lepley et al
as 2:2013cv12586
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCrory
Defendant:
Frederick J. Lepley, Mary Kelly and Cynthia Lane
McCrory #161192 v. Lepley et al
as 1:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCrory #161192
Defendant:
Frederick J. Lepley, Mary Kelly and Cynthia Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly et al v. C & W Pressroom Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Kelly , Susanne Marie Kelly and Neil Patrick Kelly
Defendant:
C & W Pressroom Products, Inc., Chevron USA, Incorporated, Flint Ink Corporation and others
Movant:
Ashland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
