Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Locklear v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00645
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Mary Locklear
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry v. Locklear
as 7:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Perry
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Primes v. Locklear
as 5:2024ct03024
Plaintiff:
James Lee Primes
Defendant:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02024
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Perry
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ishrat v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 5:2024ct03017
Plaintiff:
Khaliq Adeeb Ishrat and Willie G. Downey
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections, Mary Locklear, Tammie Stocks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHRAT v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
KHALIQ A. ISHRAT
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, MARY LOCKLEAR, TAMMIE STOCKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Locklear
as 5:2023hc02234
Petitioner:
Jarrell Damont Wilson
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cagle v. Ransom et al
as 5:2023ct03287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Cagle
Defendant:
G. Ransom, J. Hunt, Marie Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobbitt v. Locklear
as 5:2023hc02217
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear
as 23-6499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
