Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Egbert Francis, Jr. v. Mary Locklear
as 26-6931
Petitioner:
EGBERT FRANCIS, JR.
Respondent:
MARY LOCKLEAR
HEATH v. JONES et al
as 1:2026cv00773
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS D. HEATH
Defendant:
FONDA ELLISON JONES, JOHN DOE, MARY LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM-BEY v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2026cv00657
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. GRAHAM-BEY
Defendant:
WENDELL LOCKLEAR, MARY LOCKLEAR, FRED GOINS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2026cv00378
Plaintiff:
STEVIE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
MARY LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. EVERTT et al
as 1:2026cv00199
Defendant:
OFFICER EVERTT, MARY LOCKLEAR and DEON EVERTT
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM L. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Evertt et al
as 5:2026ct03051
Plaintiff:
Raheem L. Young
Defendant:
Officer Evertt, Mary Locklear and Deon Evertt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HINTON v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2026cv00173
Petitioner:
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON
Respondent:
MARY LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REEB v. STEIN et al
as 1:2026cv00143
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. REEB
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, LESLIE COOLEY DISMUKES, MARY LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2025cv01047
Plaintiff:
JA'DONAVAN JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, SGT KERNS, OFFICER SHARROCK-HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADY v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2025cv00922
Plaintiff:
TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Defendant:
MARY LOCKLEAR, CASE MANAGER SAMPSON, SERGEANT BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
