Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Tyree Wallace v. Doe, et al
as 12-3926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYREE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. F. KLEMICK, Medical Director, SCOTT WALTERS, Unit Manager, JAY JOHNSON, Counselor and others
Williams v. Bickell et al
as 3:2012cv01523
Plaintiff:
Timothy Williams
Defendant:
Tabb Bickell, John E. Wetzel, Mary Lou Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Amicus - Appellee:
N. G. BARTLEY
Roulhac v. Lawler et al
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Paul Khalifah Roulhac
Defendant:
R. M. Lawler, Mary Lou Showalter, Shoaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lennon v. Lawler et al
as 3:2011cv01307
Plaintiff:
A. Lennon
Defendant:
Lawler, Fisher, Pellegrino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groff v. Lawler et al
as 3:2010cv02340
Plaintiff:
Elsworth Leroy Groff, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Lawler, Mary Lou Showalter, Dawn Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Doe et al
as 1:2010cv00948
Plaintiff:
Tyree Wallace
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Barbara Hollibaugh, Mary Lou Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2010cv00787
Plaintiff:
Mason Anthony Wright
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Clinton Myers , Bureau of Health Care Services (BHCS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Wakefield et al
as 3:2009cv00979
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Gray
Defendant:
David J. Wakefield, Raymond M. Lawler, Michael Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Long et al
as 4:2009cv00771
Plaintiff:
Damien Phillips
Defendant:
Ronald Long, Mary Lou Showalter, David J. Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
