Cases 1 - 10 of 267
Guzman v. Tommy Carwash Systems Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Camden Guzman
Defendant:
Tommy Carwash Systems Inc. and Matt Nagelkirk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Macauley
as 1:2024cv10734
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
People and Matt Macauley
Maddock v. Michigan House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Matt Maddock
Defendant:
Michigan House of Representatives, Michigan House of Representatives' Business Office, Tabbatha Birmingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Robinson #462832 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Isaiah Robinson #462832
Respondent:
Matt Macauley, William Zeerip, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #319563 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Clinton Michael Williams #319563
Defendant:
Matt Macauley and S. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stanley
Defendant:
City of Kalamazoo, Integrated Services of Kalamazoo, Bronson Methodist Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Zeeland, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Toriyon D. Mitchell
Defendant:
Zeeland, City of and Matt Bowyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitfield v. MaCauley
as 2:2024cv10065
Petitioner:
Lenny Jessie Whitefield and Lenny Jessie Whitfield
Respondent:
Matt MaCauley
Durden v. Macauley
as 1:2023cv13282
Petitioner:
Torri Montague Durden
Respondent:
Warden and Matt Macauley
Sutherby et al v. Southgate, City of et al
as 2:2023cv13112
Plaintiff:
Kevin Charles Sutherby and Sheri M. Fricke Baker
Defendant:
Southgate, City of, Laura Winegarden, Wayne County Trial Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
