Cases 1 - 10 of 19
v. Westlake Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv00824
Defendant:
Westlake Corporation, Westlake Vinyls Company LP and Matthew Henry Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Landry v. Westlake Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv00825
Plaintiff:
Matthew Henry Landry
Defendant:
Westlake Corporation and Westlake Vinyls Company LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henry v. New York Life Insurance Company
as 3:2025cv03218
Plaintiff:
Matthew Henry
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
Grant v. Nash et al
as 5:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
Melvalena Grant
Defendant:
Mallory Hulsey, Maj Ted Kleber, Timothy R Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Remedi8, LLC v. Alliance Environmental Group, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05669
Plaintiff:
Remedi8, LLC
Defendant:
Alliance Environmental Group, LLC, Matthew Henry, Kerry Ceniceros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HENRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06230
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HENRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARRELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18538
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HENRY ARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VOLLMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83412
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HENRY VOLLMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv02042
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Frazier v. City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, et al
as 17-2832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald R. Frazier, also known as Donald Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, A public body corporate, Mike Sweeney, Matthew Henry and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
