Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Houston v. Clark County et al
as 2:2026cv01139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Clark County doing business as Jerry A. Wiese II, Office of the Public Pretender doing business as Jennifer L.G. Schwartz, Crooks, Meng Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston
as 2:2026cv01077
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. Bean
as 2:2026cv00919
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. Magma Holding, Inc. d/b/a EightVape
as 2:2026cv00742
Plaintiff:
Gregory Matthew Travis Townsend
Defendant:
Magma Holding, Inc. doing business as EightVape
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Houston v. Schwartz
as 2:2026cv00719
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Jennifer L.G. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Houston v. Schwatz
as 2:2026cv00703
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Jennifer L.G. Schwatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston, et al. v. Dzurenda, et al.
as 26-1090
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, HUNTER HADDAWAY, PAUL MCCREARY and others
Defendant:
JAMES DZURENDA, JERRY A. WIESE, II, JENNIFER SCHWARTZ and others
Houston v. Wiese, et al.
as 26-995
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant:
JERRY A. WIESE, II, DBA Jennifer L.G. Schwartz, MCCLENDON, JEREMY BEAN and others
Houston v. Wiese, et al.
as 26-623
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant:
JERRY A. WIESE, II, dba Jennifer L.G. Schwartz, MCCLENDON, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Houston v. Bean et al
as 2:2025cv02267
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean, Jerry Howell and Attorney General State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.