Cases 1 - 10 of 402
Dominick Jones v. Linsia, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK MAURICE JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINSIA, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUNWIN, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAKE, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity and others
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01862
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Linsia et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Dominick Maurice Jones
Defendant:
Unknown Linsia, Unknown Gunwin, Unknown Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. USA
as 4:2024cv10764
Petitioner:
Maurice Willis Carpenter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Andrew Randolph v. Matt Macauley
as 24-1202
Petitioner:
ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLF and ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLPH
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden
Jolly #922447 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Jolly #922447 and James Christian #815288
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Gregory, Unknown Bigalow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whyte v. Franklin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Whyte, II
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Reager, Sergeant Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
