Cases 21 - 30 of 891
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacob Pitts v. Rob Jeffries, et al
as 23-3144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFRIES, DAVID GOMEZ, MAURICE A. GEE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Jacob Pitts v. Rob Jeffries, et al
as 23-3102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB P. PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFRIES, DAVID GOMEZ, MAURICE A. GEE and others
Delphi v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv14864
Plaintiff:
Maurice Delphi
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Brian Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. United States of America, The
as 1:2023cv14584
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ward
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Weakley v. Kitch et al
as 3:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Travell Maurice Lynn Weakley
Defendant:
Robert Kitch, Joshua Morgan, Anthony Ieraci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harber et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harber, Nicholas Irvin, Stephen Looney and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SJC Coroner Patricia Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Maurice v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13253
Plaintiff:
Shantel Maurice
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weakley v. Kayla et al
as 3:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
Travell Maurice Lynn Weakley
Defendant:
Kayla, Roberta, Tracey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
