Cases 1 - 10 of 432
Pearson, Jr. v. Danfelt et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K. Danfelt, Dave Ernest, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODEN v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2024cv05440
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John McDonald v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 24-1650
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE MCDONALD
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, WARDEN FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAYBOY v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE SITARSKI et al
as 2:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE SITARSKI and CLERKS OFFICE OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. SCHLUSSELFELD et al
as 3:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. YOUNG
Defendant:
MATTHEW SCHLUSSELFELD, DUANE GRADE, DANIEL CACICIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE:CHAMBERS, SR.
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS and MAURICE CHAMBERS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. AVILES
as 2:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. McCartney et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lavon Cooper
Defendant:
Maureen McCartney, Christopher L. de Barrena - Sarobe, Jesse Wenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE:CHAMBERS
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
