Cases 41 - 50 of 299
Tuck v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv02801
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Tuck
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, The Sheriff of Fulton County Jail, The Captains of Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuck v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2022cv02736
Petitioner:
Antonio Maurice Tuck
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2022cv02725
Petitioner:
Christopher Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tuck v. Cobb County Jail
as 1:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Tuck
Defendant:
Cobb County Jail and Sheriff Craig Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The State of Georgia et al
as 5:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Thelonious Maurice Smith
Defendant:
The State of Georgia and Jorge Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Roberts et al
as 5:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jenkins
Defendant:
Lee Roberts, Nurse Wendy, Dr. Bagwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 3:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Maybrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Midvale Indemnity Company v. B-Builds Contracting, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Midvale Indemnity Company
Defendant:
B-Builds Contracting, LLC, Antonio Taylor, Jamari Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Brooks v. Jump et al
as 2:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brooks
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Jeff Gunderson, Dr. Kidder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 1:2021cv04396
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
