Cases 1 - 10 of 74
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ELLIS, WARDEN, BUILDING LIEUTENATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
RICHARDSON, WHITE, HOPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. KALLIS
as 2:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
KYLE MAURICE PARKS
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BOYKINS v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
WARDEN, OII SUPERVISOR HERE AT W.V.C.F, CLASSIFICATION SUPERVISOR HERE AT W.V.C.F and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
MAURICE DANTRELL BOYKINS
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN and TEARKNEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOATMAN, HOLMES, MORRIS, SMITH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01896
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOATMAN, MARQUES HOLMES, DAVID MORRIS and others
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DR. DAUSS, DENNIS REGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALLER v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. WALLER
Defendant:
ISSAC WALTERS, PAUL WYANT, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ALLEN WATSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
