Cases 1 - 10 of 584
Sydnor v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01764
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Sydnor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE SITARSKI et al
as 2:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE SITARSKI and CLERKS OFFICE OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
IN RE:CHAMBERS, SR.
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS and MAURICE CHAMBERS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE:CHAMBERS
as 2:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
MAURICE CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brayboy v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Maurice Brayboy
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Unit Manager Heenan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOGAN v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOGAN
Defendant:
COLWYN BOROUGH, BOROUGH OF COLWYN, MAURICE J. CLARK, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barry-Gibbons v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Stephen Maurice Barry-Gibbons
Respondent:
Superintendent MICHAEL GOURLEY and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
